Changing Voter Demographics In Collin County

The National Journal Online posts an interesting article detailing the growth of minority populations in congressional districts across the nation. The article includes an interactive map that shows the breakdown statistics of each district.

Collin County holds most of Texas Congressional District 3, currently represented by Republican Sam Johnson, in the county's densely populated southwest quadrant. A small corner of District 3 spills over to Dallas county too.

Data for TX Congressional Dist. 3

Non-hispanic white Americans have decreased in Johnson's district to 54.9 percent while the district's minority American makeup has increased 8.4 percent to 45 percent. (pie chart right)

The remaining three quarters of Collin County's geographic area is included in Texas Congressional District 4, currently represented by Republican Ralph Hall. Hall's District 4 geographic area also includes the entire northeast corner of Texas, so the district's demographic numbers mask the true makeup for Collin County's portion of the 4th congressional district.

The 1990 census listed over 80% of Collin County's citizens as "White" non-Hispanic. The population makeup has changed greatly since Johnson and Hall were first elected to office. By 2007, census estimates showed that white, non-Hispanics made up only 67 percent of the entire population of Collin County. According to 2007 census estimates 14 percent of the county is Hispanic-American, 10 percent of the county is Asian-American and not quite 8 percent of the population is African-American.

Most experts believe the demographics continue to shift in favor of minority Americans in Collin County. Indeed, the Census Bureau's recently released annual three-year (2006-2008) average American Community Survey data reported in the National Journal article suggests the county's overall population of "White" non-Hispanic Americans may soon be nearing parity with minority Americans.

Yet, Hispanic-Americans and Asian-Americans hold zero elected offices in Collin County government or in any of the county's city governments. African-Americans fare only slightly better with one African-American serving on Plano's City Council and one African-American serving as a trustee on Plano's ISD board. However, the ongoing demographic shift almost guarantees that minority Americans will soon be running for office in Collin County. And, when they do run for office, a '(D)' will mostly likely appear by their name on the election ballot!

You will be hearing more and more about the official 2010 U.S. census results and redistricting in Texas, and particularly in Collin County, over the next two years! See Collin Co. population charts after the jump.

Demographic Data for TX Congressional Dist. 3, Represented By Republican Sam Johnson

Demographic Data for TX Congressional Dist. 4, Represented By Republican Ralph Hall

Collin County District Attorney Candidates For 2010

Last September long time Collin County District Attorney John Roach announced he will not seek re-election in 2010. According to his old campaign website Mr. Roach's last day on the job as Collin County's District Attorney will be December 31, 2010.

Local publications have reported over the last several weeks that several candidates are known to have an interest in running for the soon to be vacated Collin County District Attorney's office. The list includes:

1. Former County Court Six Judge Greg Willis. Mr Willis (R) resigned his former position as County Court Six Judge in order to run for District Attorney. [campaign website]
2. Senior Legal Adviser for the Plano Police Department K. Jefferson (Jeff) Bray. Mr. Bray (R) is a former Collin and Dallas County prosecutor. [campaign website]
3. Former Dallas Police Officer and former Denton Prosecutor James (Jimmy) Angelino. Mr. Angelino (R) is currently a private practice attorney. [campaign website]
4. Former Dallas prosecutor Rafael de la Garza. Mr. De La Garza (D) is currently a private practice attorney in Plano. [campaign website]

Lessons From The GOP On How NOT To Use The Internet

Mandate Without Option?

Updated December 15, 2009 @ 5:23 PM
In light of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's decision to give in to demands from Sen. Joe Lieberman, a few blue dogs and every Republican in the Senate that the Senate must scrap the Medicare compromise, in addition to the public option that was scraped last week, many ardent supporters of health care reform have now giving up on the current version of the Senate's reform legislation.

Former presidential candidate Howard Dean said in a radio interview Tuesday that he agreed,

"This is essentially the collapse of health care reform in the United States Senate," Dean said. "Honestly the best thing to do right now is kill the Senate bill, go back to the House, start the reconciliation process, where you only need 51 votes and it would be a much simpler bill."

"Insurance companies win. Time to kill this monstrosity coming out of the Senate," wrote DailyKos founder Markos Moulitas on his Twitter feed.

Updated December 14, 2009 @ 6:58 PM
Senate Democrats have apparently agreed to axe the "Medicare buy-in down to age 55" proposal, as well as any "public option" proposal. The Senate health care plan is now essentially the bill proposed by Sen. Max Baucus last September -- a mandate for all Americans to buy health insurance, primarily from private health insurance companies, or face a civil penalty. [Bloomberg]

As this blog has been posting since mid-2009 this is what private health insurance companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying money to buy. [see Insurance Industry Pushing For "Private, For Profit" Mandate In Reform]

This would force up to 40 million people to buy health insurance from private for profit health insurance companies, an unprecedented mandate -- long sought by insurance companies -- that would mark the first time the federal government has compelled consumers to buy a single industry's product, effectively creating a captive market.

Originally posted on September 25, 2009
Via FDL - The Los Angeles Times has a must-read piece today on the problems of an individual mandate without cost controls attached:

In the drive to bring health coverage to almost every American, lawmakers have largely rejected restrictions on how much insurers can charge, sparking fears that consumers will continue to face the skyrocketing premium increases of recent years.

The legislators' reluctance to control premium costs comes despite the fact that they intend to require virtually all Americans to get health insurance, an unprecedented mandate -- long sought by insurance companies -- that would mark the first time the federal government has compelled consumers to buy a single industry's product, effectively creating a captive market.

"We are about to force at least 30 million people into an insurance market where the sharks are circling," said California Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, a Democrat who served as the state's insurance commissioner for eight years. "Without effective protections, they will be eaten alive."

Soaring premiums coupled with millions of new customers forced to buy policies would likely mean higher costs for taxpayers to cover government subsidies for lower-income families and individuals...

..."If the government is going to require people to buy an insurance policy, they have to guarantee it is affordable," said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. "It is unconscionable not to."

The Baucus bill is a mandate with no price controls, because it lacks a public health insurance option to increase competition with private insurance.

First read the article at Fire Dog Lake and then read the Los Angeles Times article.

Related posts:

• Insurance Industry Pushing For "Private, For Profit" Mandate In Reform